34469 Y103 John Watson, a leading childcare autho-
rity in the '20s, sternly advised parents, 'NEVER HUG AND KISS [YOUR CHILDREN], NEVER LET THEM SIT IN YOUR LAP. BUT ÌF YOU MÙST, KISS THEM ONCE ON THE FOREHEAD WHEN THEY SAY GOOD NIGHT. SHAKE HANDS WITH THEM IN THE MORNING!' The popular magazine Infant Care explained that the secret of raising children is to maintain discipline and to provide the children's material needs according to a strict daily schedule?! A 1929 article instructed parents that if an infant cries out for food before the normal feeding time, 'Do not hold him, nor rock him to stop his crying, and do not nurse him until the exact hour for the feeding comes! It will not hurt the baby, even the tiny baby, to cry!' ONLY IN THE 1950s & '60s did a growing consensus of experts abandone these strict behaviorist theories and acknowledge the central importance of emotional needs. In a series of famous (and shockingly cruel) ex-
periments, the psychologist Harry Harlow separated infant monkeys from their mothers shortly after birth, and isolated them in small cages! When given a choice between a metal dummy-mother fitted with a milk bottle, & a soft cloth covered dummy with no milk, the baby monkeys clung to the barren cloth mother for all they were worth. Those baby monkeys knew something that John Watson & the experts of Infant Care failed to realize: mammals can't live on for alone. They need emotional bonds too. Millions of years of evo-lution preprogrammed the monkeys with an overwhelming desire for emotional bonding. Evolution also imprinted them with the as-sumption that emotional bonds are more likely to be formed with soft furry things than with hard and metallic objects. This is also why small human children are far more likely to become attached to dolls, blankets & smelly rags than to cutlery, stones or wooden blocks.) The need for emotional bonds is so strong that Harlows's baby monkeys abandoned the nourishing metal dummy and turned their at-tention to the only object that seemed capable of answering that need! Alas, the cloth-mother never responded to their affection and the little monkeys consequently suffered from severe psychological & social problems, and grew up to be neurotic & asocial adults...
Asih, man, 79 jaar
Log in om een reactie te plaatsen.
-
O
24 jun 2024
47707Ook ik moet bij dit myDiverhaal denken aan ‘t
-
O
24 jun 2024
47706155Dus in tegenstelling tot Sjmoe’ël, die was
-
O
23 jun 2024
47705 Dawiedewiedewied, De Tegenkoning voor onze
-
O
23 jun 2024
47704 154 Na ruim vier uur lezen & praten neemt Ad
-
O
23 jun 2024
47703 In ‘t Bijbelboek Sjmoe’el breekt de tijd aan
-
O
23 jun 2024
47702 Maar in het Verhaal is ‘t niet de Rechter…
-
O
23 jun 2024
47701152 De Profeet Sjmoe’el? ‘t Verhaal van David
-
O
22 jun 2024
47700151 In de Verhalen van en over YÈSJ in ‘t NOT
-
O
22 jun 2024
47699150/12Dawiedewiedewied, koning van Israël: zó
-
O
22 jun 2024
47698Is Mo dan wel zo’n heilige? Ook hij werd toch
-
O
22 jun 2024
47697149 BB, vanaf het Haegs Hubertusduin reageer
-
O
22 jun 2024
47696 Ik wil, zoals je weet, begrijpen in welke
-
O
21 jun 2024
47695 Mosjeh, Matai, Lama: waaròm, wanneer, hoe èn
-
O
20 jun 2024
47694148 G d is bij ‘m & ZÈGT: “Dit is ‘t Lànd dat
-
O
20 jun 2024
47693 Het Verhaal van Mosjeh & z’n Volk is dus ook
vorige
volgende