39058RDOG18TheSameApplies ToTheStoriesInTheOT&NOT?
We
have no
more reason to
believe them than we
do Homer’s stories about Achilles or Helen.
The stories of Abraham & Joseph and so on are Hebrew legends,
just as Homer’s are Greek legends & how about the New Testament?
It offers a better hope of finding true history because it refers to a more recent period than the Old:
a mere 2000 years ago! But how much do we really know about ‘Jesus’: can we be sure ‘he’ even
really existed? Most, though not all, modern scholars think he probably did! What evidence do we have?
The so-called Gospels? They’re printed at the beginning of the New Testament, so you might think they were written first. Actually, the oldest books in the NOT come near the end: the letters of “SAINT” Paul, Sha’ul. Unfortunately, SP says hardly anything about Jesus’s life. There’s lots about the religious meaning of YESH, especially his death & resurrection. But almost nothing that even claims to be history.
Maybe SP thought his readers already knew the story of Jesus’s life? But it’s also possible SP didn’t know it himself? Remember, these gospels were not yet written! Or maybe he didn’t think it was even important. This lack of facts about YESH in Paul’s letters makes historians wonder. Isn’t it a little odd that this SP, who wanted people to worship Yehoshua, says almost nothing about what this YESH actually said or did?
Another thing that worries historians is that there are hardly any mentions of Yeshua in histories outside the gospels. The Jewish historian Josephus (AD 37-c.100), writing in Greek, only had this to say: ABOUT THIS TIME THERE LIVED JESUS, A WISE MAN, IF INDEED ONE OUGHT TO CALL HIM A MAN. For he was one who performed surprising deeds &
was a teacher of such people as to accept the truth gladly.
He won over many Jews & many of the Greeks.
He was the Messiah.
And when, upon the accusation of the principal men among us, Pilate had condemned him to a cross, those who had first come to love him did not cease.
He appeared to them spending a third day to life restored, for the prophets of God had foretold these things & a thousand other marvels about him & the tribe of the Christians, so called after him,
has still to this day not disappeared.
Als je heen & weer lift & loopt tussen de Vale Ouwe & Decima kun je ‘hem’ in tientallen landen
ook nu nog steeds ‘ontmoeten’...
have no
more reason to
believe them than we
do Homer’s stories about Achilles or Helen.
The stories of Abraham & Joseph and so on are Hebrew legends,
just as Homer’s are Greek legends & how about the New Testament?
It offers a better hope of finding true history because it refers to a more recent period than the Old:
a mere 2000 years ago! But how much do we really know about ‘Jesus’: can we be sure ‘he’ even
really existed? Most, though not all, modern scholars think he probably did! What evidence do we have?
The so-called Gospels? They’re printed at the beginning of the New Testament, so you might think they were written first. Actually, the oldest books in the NOT come near the end: the letters of “SAINT” Paul, Sha’ul. Unfortunately, SP says hardly anything about Jesus’s life. There’s lots about the religious meaning of YESH, especially his death & resurrection. But almost nothing that even claims to be history.
Maybe SP thought his readers already knew the story of Jesus’s life? But it’s also possible SP didn’t know it himself? Remember, these gospels were not yet written! Or maybe he didn’t think it was even important. This lack of facts about YESH in Paul’s letters makes historians wonder. Isn’t it a little odd that this SP, who wanted people to worship Yehoshua, says almost nothing about what this YESH actually said or did?
Another thing that worries historians is that there are hardly any mentions of Yeshua in histories outside the gospels. The Jewish historian Josephus (AD 37-c.100), writing in Greek, only had this to say: ABOUT THIS TIME THERE LIVED JESUS, A WISE MAN, IF INDEED ONE OUGHT TO CALL HIM A MAN. For he was one who performed surprising deeds &
was a teacher of such people as to accept the truth gladly.
He won over many Jews & many of the Greeks.
He was the Messiah.
And when, upon the accusation of the principal men among us, Pilate had condemned him to a cross, those who had first come to love him did not cease.
He appeared to them spending a third day to life restored, for the prophets of God had foretold these things & a thousand other marvels about him & the tribe of the Christians, so called after him,
has still to this day not disappeared.
Als je heen & weer lift & loopt tussen de Vale Ouwe & Decima kun je ‘hem’ in tientallen landen
ook nu nog steeds ‘ontmoeten’...
22 aug 2020 - bewerkt op 25 aug 2020
- meld ongepast verhaal
Log in om een reactie te plaatsen.
- O 23 jun 2023 44565 Net als de gezinnen in de plattelandsdorpen
- O 23 jun 2023 4456477 Het stadsleven speelde zich af in de nauwe
- O 23 jun 2023 44563 ‘n Romeins reliëf toont ons een koopman van
- O 23 jun 2023 4456276De Farizeeën van Jerusalem verstonden onder
- O 21 jun 2023 44551De Tempelpriesters v/d Oude Stempel die Trouw
- O 20 jun 2023 44546 Van ‘n welgestelde weduwe werd verteld, dat
- O 20 jun 2023 44545 75 Toen/nu/straks? Er was weinig plaats voor
- O 19 jun 2023 44544 Telkens tartende tradities te kust & te keur
- O 19 jun 2023 44543 74 Als ‘t tot ‘n botsing kwam, spitste zich
- O 19 jun 2023 4454273 Alternatieve Bóeren Communale Doelen Enzo?
- O 19 jun 2023 4454072Ènkele torens v/d Stad maakten deel uit van
- O 18 jun 2023 4453971Òp de plaats v/d oude, i/d oorlog verwoeste
- O 17 jun 2023 44536 Al die plekken waren ooit centra van helle~
- O 17 jun 2023 44535 70 Oosterse Ontdekkingen Westerse Invloeden
- O 17 jun 2023 44533 68 Het hete, zongeblakerde Jericho was voor